Predicting severity of community-acquired pneumonia with AMBU-65/CURB-65 sc - Evidencio
Predicting severity of community-acquired pneumonia with AMBU-65/CURB-65 score (copy)
Prediction tool to define community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital, recommended by the British Thoracic Society. 
Research authors: Lim W, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma W, Karalus N, Town G, Lewis S, and Macfarlane J.
Version: 1.2
  • Public
  • Pulmonology
  • {{ modelType }}
  • Details
  • Validate algorithm
  • Save input
  • Load input
Display
Units

{{section.title}}

Calculate the result

Set more parameters to perform the calculation

Calculated CURB-65/AMBU-65 score: points

{{ resultSubheader }}
{{ chart.title }}
Result interval {{ additionalResult.min }} to {{ additionalResult.max }}

Conditional information

How this model should be used:
The CURB-65/AMBU-65 model is a one step strategy for stratifying patients with CAP into risk groups according to risk of mortality at 30 days.1

  • Patients with CURB-65 scores 0 and 1 are at low risk of mortality (<2%) and might be suitable for management as hospital outpatients or by their general practitioner.
  • Patients with a score of 2 are at intermediate risk of mortality (9%) and should be considered for hospital supervised treatment.
  • Patients with  a score >2 are at high risk of mortality (>19%) and should be treated in hospital. Initial care in an intensive care or high dependency unit may be appropriate in those with the highest scores.
Note:
Although low serum albumin was identified as a strong independent prognostic variable in addition to the CURB score for predicting 30 day mortality, it was not included in the final model as it is not a routinely available test in many hospitals. If serum albumin level is at your disposal, you might consider using a more extended model including serum albumin.

Source:
  1. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003;58(5):377-82.

{{ file.classification }}
PRO
Note
Notes are only visible in the result download and will not be saved by Evidencio

This algorithm is provided for educational, training and information purposes. It must not be used to support medical decision making, or to provide medical or diagnostic services. Read our full disclaimer.

Underlying algorithms Part of
Comments
Comment
Please enter a comment
Comments are visible to anyone

Algorithm feedback

No feedback yet 1 Comment {{ model.comments.length }} Comments
On {{ comment.created_at }} {{ comment.user.username }} a no longer registered author wrote:
{{ comment.content }}
logo

Please sign in to enable Evidencio print features

In order to use the Evidencio print features, you need to be logged in.
If you don't have an Evidencio Community Account you can create your free personal account at:

https://www.evidencio.com/registration

Printed results - Examples {{ new Date().toLocaleString() }}


Evidencio Community Account Benefits


With an Evidencio Community account you can:

  • Create and publish your own prediction algorithms.
  • Share your prediction algorithms with your colleagues, research group, organization or the world.
  • Review and provide feedback on algorithms that have been shared with you.
  • Validate your algorithms and validate algorithms from other users.
  • Find algorithms based on Title, Keyword, Author, Institute, or MeSH classification.
  • Use and save prediction algorithms and their data.
  • Use patient specific protocols and guidelines based on sequential algorithms and decision trees.
  • Stay up-to-date with new algorithms in your field as they are published.
  • Create your own lists of favorite algorithms and topics.

A personal Evidencio account is free, with no strings attached!
Join us and help create clarity, transparency, and efficiency in the creation, validation, and use of medical prediction algorithms.


Disclaimer: Calculations alone should never dictate patient care, and are no substitute for professional judgement.
Evidencio v3.35 © 2015 - 2025 Evidencio. All Rights Reserved