Six item cognitive impairment test (6-item CIT)
De 6-item CIT is een korte vragenlijst bestaande 6 items, welke niet beïnvloed wordt door opleidingsniveau van de proefpersoon. Afname duurt slechts 2-3 minuten. Deze Nederlandse versie van de vragenlijst is gevalideerd ten opzichte van de Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Een optimale cutt-off score or cognitieve problemen is een totale score van ≥11 (in oversteenstemming met MMSE ≥23).
Research authors: None
Version: 1.10
  • Public
  • Geriatrics
  • {{ modelType }}
  • Details
  • Validate model
  • Save input
  • Load input
Display
Units

{{section.title}}

Calculate the result

Set more parameters to perform the calculation

6-item CIT score: punten

{{ resultSubheader }}
{{ chart.title }}
Result interval {{ additionalResult.min }} to {{ additionalResult.max }}

Conditional information

De 6-item CIT is een korte vragenlijst bestaande 6 items, welke niet beïnvloed wordt door opleidingsniveau van de proefpersoon. Afname duurt slechts 2-3 minuten. Onderstaande Nederlandse versie is gebaseerd op een Nederlandse versie van de vragenlijst die gevalideerd is ten opzichte van de Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)1-3 . De gehanteerde optimale cutt-off van de 6-CIT varieert in de literatuur van >7 tot >10 (vergelijkbaar met MMSE score 24).1-3 Daarom is hier gekozen voor het vermelden van de geassocieerde sensitiviteit en specificeit met de verschillende afkappunten, zoals gevonden bij externe validatie studies.

Referenties: 

  1. Brooke P, Bullock R. Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14(11):936-940.
  2. Tuijl JP, Scholte EM, de Craen AJ, van der Mast RC. Screening for cognitive impairement in older general hospital patients: comparison of the Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test with the Mimi-Mental State Examination. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011.

{{ file.classification }}
PRO
Note
Notes are only visible in the result download and will not be saved by Evidencio

This model is provided for educational, training and information purposes. It must not be used to support medical decision making, or to provide medical or diagnostic services. Read our full disclaimer.

Underlying models Part of
Comments
Comment
Please enter a comment
Comments are visible to anyone

Model feedback

No feedback yet 1 Comment {{ model.comments.length }} Comments
On {{ comment.created_at }} {{ comment.user.username }} a no longer registered author wrote:
{{ comment.content }}
logo

Please sign in to enable Evidencio print features

In order to use the Evidencio print features, you need to be logged in.
If you don't have an Evidencio Community Account you can create your free personal account at:

https://www.evidencio.com/registration

Printed results - Examples {{ new Date().toLocaleString() }}

Evidencio Community Account Benefits

With an Evidencio Community account you can:

  • Create and publish your own prediction models.
  • Share your prediction models with your colleagues, research group, organization or the world.
  • Review and provide feedback on models that have been shared with you.
  • Validate your models and validate models from other users.
  • Find models based on Title, Keyword, Author, Institute, or MeSH classification.
  • Use and save prediction models and their data.
  • Use patient specific protocols and guidelines based on sequential models and decision trees.
  • Stay up-to-date with new models in your field as they are published.
  • Create your own lists of favorite models and topics.

A personal Evidencio account is free, with no strings attached!
Join us and help create clarity, transparency, and efficiency in the creation, validation, and use of medical prediction models.

Disclaimer: Calculations alone should never dictate patient care, and are no substitute for professional judgement.
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact | Refuse cookies |
Evidencio v3.31 © 2015 - 2024 Evidencio. All Rights Reserved