Wells’ Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism (PE) - Evidencio
Wells’ Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Objectifies risk of pulmonary embolism.

The Wells’ Criteria risk stratifies patients for pulmonary embolism (PE) and provides an estimated pre-test probability.

The physician can then choose what further testing is required for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (i.e. d-dimer or CT angiogram).

Research authors: Philip S. Wells, David R. Anderson, Marc Rodger, Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, Clive Kearon, Michael Gent, Alexander G. G. Turpie, Janis Bormanis, Jeffrey Weitz, Michael Chamberlain, Dennis Bowie, David Barnes, Jack Hirsh
Version: 1.5
  • Public
  • Pulmonology
  • {{ modelType }}
V-1.5-154.25.08.25
(01)08720938015328(8012)v1.5(4326)250825(240)154
Download the User manual and consult the Intended purpose.
Units

{{ section.title }}

{{ section.description }}

Calculate the result

Set more parameters to perform the calculation

Wells' Score for pulmonary embolism:

{{ resultSubheader }}
{{ $t('download_result_availability') }}
{{ chart.title }}
Result interval {{ additionalResult.min }} to {{ additionalResult.max }}

Conditional information

The Wells’ Criteria for PE can be used with either 3 tiers (low, moderate, high) or 2 tiers (unlikely, likely), which are both endorsed by multiple guidelines.

It risk stratifies patients for pulmonary embolism (PE), and has been validated in both inpatient and emergency department settings. There must first be a clinical suspicion for PE in the patient (the criteria should not be applied to all patients with chest pain or shortness of breath, for example).

It is not meant to diagnose PE but to guide workup by predicting pre-test probability of PE and appropriate testing to rule out the diagnosis.

Its score is often used in conjunction with d-dimer testing to evaluate for PE. The criteria should not be determined after the results of a d-dimer assay are known.

{{ file.classification }}
Note
Notes are only visible in the result download and will not be saved by Evidencio

Calculations alone should never dictate patient care, and are no substitute for professional judgement. See our full disclaimer.

Underlying algorithms Part of
logo

Please sign in to enable Evidencio print features

In order to use the Evidencio print features, you need to be logged in.
If you don't have an Evidencio Community Account you can create your free personal account at:

https://www.evidencio.com/registration

Printed results - Examples {{ new Date().toLocaleString() }}


Evidencio Community Account Benefits


With an Evidencio Community account you can:

  • Create and publish your own prediction algorithms.
  • Share your prediction algorithms with your colleagues, research group, organization or the world.
  • Review and provide feedback on algorithms that have been shared with you.
  • Validate your algorithms and validate algorithms from other users.
  • Find algorithms based on Title, Keyword, Author, Institute, or MeSH classification.
  • Use and save prediction algorithms and their data.
  • Use patient specific protocols and guidelines based on sequential algorithms and decision trees.
  • Stay up-to-date with new algorithms in your field as they are published.
  • Create your own lists of favorite algorithms and topics.

A personal Evidencio account is free, with no strings attached!
Join us and help create clarity, transparency, and efficiency in the creation, validation, and use of medical prediction algorithms.


Disclaimer: Calculations alone should never dictate patient care, and are no substitute for professional judgement.
Evidencio v3.38 © 2015 - 2025 Evidencio. All Rights Reserved